Medical Use

woo hoo! pot has no medical benefits, but, if it's sold by one of the politcal bigshot's buddies in the pharmaceutical industry then it is elegible for the good old double standard and good to go! Case in point? sure! There is a new comment on the post "Pushing Back : ONDCP Releases 2008 Marijuana Sourcebook". http://stash.norml.org/2008/07/29/pushing-back-ondcp-releases-2008-marijuana-sou rcebook/ Author: Richard P Steeb Comment: "...Marinol... It’s 100% THC" Marinol's 5 or 10 milligrams of THC is dissolved in sesame oil; it is no where near 100% THC, unless you are referring to the cannabinoid content within the pill. (that part Must be the "deadly 100% THC till it is magically diluted with sesame oil, Then it is OK, how could you be so stupid as to need drug warriors to explain that????? unless they are lying, of course?) If $15/gram pot contains the alleged 10% THC, the price of herbal THC is then $150 a gram.  ( if You can get it then it must be "smokable" and therefore disgusting. if They sell it to you, then it is worth what they charge, never mind it is 10X what you pay the "black market" the pharmaceutical corps are "white market". how could you be such a disloyal criminal as to need these simple facts of life explained to you over and over? obviously we need to start at a younger age in school to get these "facts" across.) 10mg Marinols are $23.59 at drugstore.com which equates to $2,359 per gram.  (see, if you have to pay $23 for one pill of pharmaceutical THC and used that same price conversion on your reefer, well, it would be, let's just say, a bit more expensive to buy yur weed, you criminals can not add! remember that! you are supposed to be dumb and let the drug warriors think for you!) See how much more efficient Marinol is than pot-- at transferring wealth!? (I sure do! that's why they call me SuckMeBush!) See all comments on this post here: http://stash.norml.org/2008/07/29/pushing-back-ondcp-releases-2008-marijuana-sou rcebook/#comments comments in parenthesis are from hackers who invaded the site. they probably smoke dope and then disguise themselves by going to work everyday. dis-gusting! happy trails
 
I have been vilified! Oh, I called a drug warrior a wanker and she was miffed. She? oh, dear, and all she did was lie her ass off. She was very put out that someone "like you" would be insulted that she was doing it to the younger set and use such a feable minded reason as lying to the youth as an excuse for my being angry. She was dribbling more of the old pot will rot your brain. Speaking as a pot grower/toker: political substitutions of fake science for genuine fact is what rots my mind. Kira White, your politics rot my mind. You can bet I will be watching for more lies from your keyboard and out you when you try to poison us with them. Let's try some medical, objective, court grade evidence from Merck Medical Manual: The following is an excerpt from the Merck Manual, the US military's field guide to medicine:
...no physical dependence [as a result of cannabis usage]; no abstinence syndrome when the drug is discontinued.Cannabis can be used on an episodic but continuous basis without evidence of social or psychic dysfunction. In many users the term dependence with it's obvious connotations probably is misapplied. Many of the claims regarding severe biological impact are still uncertain, but some others are not. Despite the acceptance of the 'new' dangers of marijuana, there is still little evidence of biologic damage even among relatively heavy users. This is true even in the areas intensively investigated, such aspulmonary, immunologic, and reproductive function. Marijuana used in the USA has a higher THC content than in the past. Many critics have incorporated this fact into warnings, but the chief opposition to the drug rests on a moral and political, and not a toxicological, foundation.
(Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 15th edition, 1987,Robert Berkow, MD, Editor-In-Chief. Published by Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories Division of Merck and Co, Inc) Merck must be pot heads to Ms White. They disagreed so they must need to get a life, too. I also told her I had the same blood THC level she had. This anecdotally proves that there are no addictive qualities whatsoever to cannabis as I experienced none of any sort when I quit to protect myself from other drug warriors of her filthy kind from taking my freedom. But, they don't care about my health a bit. That is all just more drug warrior lying. Maybe they could care about the medical health of my eleven year old daughter? Oh, no, they murdered her and now she is in a cemetary where the drug warriors forced us to put her after they fixed her. Drug warriors? you suck. That is why my user name is SuckMeBush. Your highest leader is contemptable to me and so are the rest of you. Let my people go!
   

Cannabis-Linked Cell Receptor Might Help Prevent Colon Cancer

Findings may serve as new path for better treatment of disease, study suggests

-- Robert Preidt

FRIDAY, Aug. 1 (HealthDay News) -- A cannabinoid receptor lying on the surface of cells may help suppress colorectal cancer, say U.S. researchers. When the receptor is turned off, tumor growth is switched on. Cannabinoids are compounds related to the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) found in the cannabis plant. It's already known that the receptor, CB1, plays a role in relieving pain and nausea, elevating mood and stimulating appetite by serving as a docking station for the cannabinoid group of signaling molecules. This study suggests that CB1 may offer a new path for cancer prevention or treatment. "We've found that CB1 expression is lost in most colorectal cancers, and when that happens, a cancer-promoting protein is free to inhibit cell death," senior author Dr. Raymond Dubois, provost and executive vice president of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, said in a university news release. In their study of human colorectal tumor specimens, the researchers also found that the drug decitabine can restore CB1 expression. In addition, mice that are prone to developing intestinal tumors and also have functioning CB1 receptors developed fewer and smaller tumors when treated with a drug that mimics a cannabinoid receptor ligand, the researchers found. Ligands are molecules that function by binding to specific receptors. "Potential application of cannabinoids as anti-tumor drugs is an exciting prospect, because cannabinoid agonists (synthetic molecules that mimic the action of natural molecules) are being evaluated now to treat the side effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy," DuBois said. "Turning CB1 back on and then treating with a cannabinoid agonist could provide a new approach to colorectal cancer treatment or prevention." The study was published in the Aug. 1 issue of the journal Cancer Research. The American Cancer Society has more about colorectal cancer.

content by:

Healthday

SOURCE: University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, news release, Aug. 1, 2008

Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved. Ya know what I like? A great, scientific reason to legalize cannabis. Would that be because I just want to smoke a blunt? No, I fought off cancer and if we can really identify legitimate uses of cannabis it would be unlikely for the drug warrior morons, hicks and jackasses to have looked in this wonderful stash of God-given medicines so this is a whole new series of medicines to help us not have to live and die in agony from preventable cancer. In short, if they don't expect to find anything good and we are looking in that place instead of where schedule one says nothing can be found, then we are performing good science. It is good science to examine cannabis for medicinal effects. How would we know that? Well, we could start by examining the patent office where the good old federal USA has around 100 patents on file for medical marijuana Right Now. YEP, the federal drug warriors are completely lying hypocrits to be arresting sick little old ladies for growing pot in their own yards to stop dying in agony. I am a very serious Christian, but praying is not enough, my friends. We need to get out the vote. We need to read these blogs I am putting up for you and we need to back NORML. God bless your gardens

   
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/543/austria_parliament_bill_medical_marijuana   The Austrian parliament approved a bill July 9 that allows for the cultivation of marijuana for medical and scientific purposes, Agence France-Presse reported. But the bill gives the exclusive right to grow marijuana to a health and food safety agency under the control of the Health Ministry.
Hoffburg Palace area, downtown Vienna
Still, it is progress, said Michael Bach, president of the Austrian pain studies association OeSG. "Any initiative that makes it possible to develop and provide new drugs for pain therapy is welcome," he said. "Substances drawn from cannabis have been used for medical purposes more and more in the last few years," he added. It is unclear whether or how quickly this move will result in the provision of medical marijuana to patients or whether it signals a softening of official attitudes toward medical marijuana users. Currently, possession of sales of marijuana will get you six months in prison in Austria. High folks! It's me, your humble narrator, SuckMeBush and, as we can see from the above article, the stranglehold is loosening a bit at a time all over the whole world. Great, isn't it? One day, you will be able to tell your kids, or theirs, you future old hippies lol, that you were part of the reefer revolution back in the day while it was still in the grip of the assholes who called themselves "drug warriors". or, as we call them now, assholes who call themselves drug warriors. Happy Trails
   
State Laws Authorizing Physician-Supervised Use Of Marijuana Unaffected By Ruling Washington, DC: The US Supreme Court today (6/6/05) reversed a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision which found that the federal prosecution of patients who cultivate and possess marijuana for their own medicinal use is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause authority. As a result, the court struck down an injunction barring the Justice Department from arresting the respondents -- California medical cannabis patients Angel McClary Raich and Diane Monson -- for violating the federal Controlled Substances Act. Ms. Raich and Ms. Monson had filed suit in federal court in 2002 seeking to bar the US Justice Department from taking legal action against them for their state-sanctioned use of medicinal cannabis. "While we are disappointed with the Court's decision, the bottom line is that state and local laws protecting medicinal cannabis patients and their physicians remain in place and are unaffected by this ruling," NORML Executive Director Allen St. Pierre said. Eleven states -- Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington -- have passed laws exempting patients who use cannabis under a physician's supervision from state criminal penalties. "With this ruling, Congress and the Justice Department have a choice: They can choose to waste taxpayers' dollars and undermine states' rights by arresting and prosecuting seriously ill patients who possess and use medical cannabis in compliance with state law, or they can choose more worthwhile priorities, like protecting national security and targeting violent criminals," St. Pierre said. He added that pending in Congress is House Bill HR 2087, "the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act," sponsored by Reps. Barney Frank (D-MA), Ron Paul (R-TX), Sam Farr (D-CA), Rohrabacher, and Hinchey, along with 31 co-sponsors, which would reclassify marijuana under federal law to properly recognize its medical utility and enable physicians to legally prescribe it under controlled circumstances.

Angel Raich Angel McClary Raich

"The Court's decision today underscores the need for Congress to amend federal law to recognize cannabis' therapeutic utility," St. Pierre said." Throughout our history, the public has looked to state legislatures and Congress -- not the courts -- to be the architects of public policy. With 80 percent of Americans as well as numerous health organizations, including the American Nurses Association and the American Public Health Association, in favor of legalizing the physician-supervised use of medicinal cannabis, it's time for the federal government to butt out of doctors' decisions regarding which medicine is the most safe and effective for their patients."

Diane Monson Diane Monson

Respondents co-counsel, NORML Legal Committee member David Michael agreed. "This decision is a great leap backwards by the Supreme Court, in eroding the Rehnquist Court’s Commerce Clause legacy and creating chaos by pitting the Federal Government against its own citizens and their individual states," he said. "Where the Supreme Court has failed, it is now up to Congress to protect the citizens of this country and their states from an overreaching federal government." For more information, please contact either Allen St. Pierre or Paul Armentano at (202) 483-5500. Respondents' co-counsel, NORML Legal Committee member David Michael is also available for comment at (415) 621-4500.
High folks, I don't know for sure about you, but as a medical cannabis user here in Iowa, I feel some King Bush hate in the latest actions going on. It's not a big surprise, just remember this Supreme Court is the outfit that took over the public vote from the citizens of Florida eight years ago and gave us this mass murderer in the first place. Now here they are flexing and ignoring the agony of the inoperable, such as myself and many thousands as well. Like the article I quoted up for us, the people are depending on the congress to protect us. And how about that here in Iowa? We have two congressmen, real dope warriors. One, Grassley, great name, pukey politics, telling us recently that smoking pot, doesn't matter why, will make you jump out the window. And drug warrior congressman Harkin, telling us we pot smokers will sell our children to get more dope. These two are real sources of hope, NOT. Now, do not put me down as big on Obama, I am not, but we have so few choices other than him to finish the job of administering the shoe of the voters to the repelicon ass that we have got to hope to God he sticks with his statements that he would lighten up on us medical cannabis user/growers. Legalize medical cannabis in the mid West of the United States of America NOW. Happy trails
   
The advertising flier left no doubt about its pitch: a giant marijuana leaf with a phone number that ended GOT KUSH. A friend's teenage daughter brought it home from last weekend's Earth Day celebration on the Santa Monica Pier. What else would I expect from a concert held on 4/20 -- a shorthand reference to smoking pot -- that featured reggae artist Ziggy Marley, son of Bob?

"Have you or anyone else experienced an illness [for] which you believe marijuana could provide relief?" the flier read. "If you don't qualify for a recommendation, your visit is free." I'd seen similar ads before. Walk along the Venice boardwalk and it's hard to not get handed one of those head-shop postcards promising instant approval to smoke marijuana. I'd dismissed the claim as a marketing gimmick. But it left me wondering: Could you really just walk in off the street and get marijuana? The West Hollywood clinic took walk-in patients, so I stopped by Wednesday afternoon. I rode the elevator up with a brawny man in a wheelchair and the middle-aged woman accompanying him. We made small talk about the heat wave and the difficulty of finding a place to park. In the waiting room, I filled out a sheaf of forms, accurately answering questions about my medical history, current symptoms and past use of cannabis. I gave the polite, tattooed man behind the counter my driver's license, credit card and a coupon giving me a $25 discount on the $175 exam. Fifteen minutes later, I was greeted by the doctor, a silver-haired man in a white lab coat, his name embroidered across the front. Diplomas lined the wall behind him. On his desk was a collection of family photos. He looked over my medical forms and asked about the arthritis I'd noted. I told him the truth. Some days my fingers are so stiff it hurts to grip a doorknob or a steering wheel. I'd tried prescription drugs in the past, but stopped because of the side effects. The doctor inspected my swollen fingers, gently squeezing the tender joints. He checked my pulse and blood pressure, then took a stethoscope and listened to my lungs. His 10-minute exam was about as thorough as the one I'd received last year from the hand specialist at the orthopedic center, who sent me home with Celebrex. This new doctor told me marijuana could help. He recommended I not smoke it. Bad for the lungs. Better to use it with a vaporizer. Or ingest it, infused in tea or baked in brownies. Then he handed me a prescription for marijuana. Good for one year; no refill limits. Idon't know why I was surprised. I'm the kind of person covered by the state's 1996 Compassionate Use Act, which allows the use of medicinal marijuana in California. The law allows physicians to recommend marijuana for the treatment of "cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief." I was with the 56% of California voters who approved the law 12 years ago. It's not my place to judge an adult who chooses a bong hit over Vicodin. So why did I feel vaguely criminal as I stuffed my cannabis card -- resembling a tiny passport, embossed with a marijuana leaf -- in my wallet? Because I'm from a generation in which marijuana was plainly illegal and thus the province of the young -- clandestinely purchased with a wad of singles, smoked with a rowdy crowd of buddies, accompanied by laughter and loud music. And because I've heard from friends -- and my own teenage daughters -- that getting a cannabis card at 18 has become a rite of passage in some quarters.

Why bother trying to find a dope dealer when you can shop for weed at a place as familiar as a mini-mart? Iwas buzzed in at the marijuana dispensary across the street from the doctor's office. I handed my prescription to a hand that reached out through a hole in a black-glass window that I couldn't see through. I was buzzed in through a second door and stood dumbstruck in front of a counter with more than a dozen varieties of marijuana on display.

A thin young man with a ponytail explained the different types and their effects on the body and mind, just like those pamphlets I get when I pick up my blood pressure and cholesterol medications from Rite-Aid. I was struck by how ordinary it all seemed, trying to decide between marijuanas. A sativa or an indica? I felt like I was at the apple bin at Trader Joe's choosing between Fuji and Gala. I left with a red vial of sweet-smelling Yumbolt, at $55 for an eighth of an ounce. I carried it home in the trunk of my car, convinced that every cop I passed could tell I was transporting marijuana. At home, I couldn't get the bottle open. My fingers weren't strong enough to pop the top. Which is just as well. I'm not going to smoke it. The feds don't recognize California's medical marijuana law. The DEA has been raiding dispensaries here; I don't want federal agents knocking on my door. So, on Friday, I brought the bottle into my office and my editor watched me flush it down the toilet. The experience left me with so much to think about, it's best I'm clear-headed while I work through it.

   

Page 5 of 6

Hawaiian hybrid buds - herbal mood enhancement pills, smoking accessories from. http://www.legalbuds.com